-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
the home."
*
* ...then the Supreme Court ruled that a barn sixty yards from a
farmhouse
* was too far away from a house to expect privacy.
*
* ...then the Supreme Court ruled that aerial surveillance did not
constitute
* a Fourth Amendment search.
*
* ...then the Supreme Court ruled that a "precision aerial mapping
camera"
* that was able to capture objects as small as one-half inch in diameter
did
* not constitute a Fourth Amendment search.
...then courts ruled that infrared surveillance of homes was permissible.
What is this?
* Subject: Re: Law Enforcement Aviation
* From: aufsj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 1996/12/27
* Newsgroups: rec.aviation.military
*
* What interests me is how new technologies will be interpreted. I
recently
* inquired at the local Law School about the courts views towards the
use
* of impulse radar, and they said "Impulse what the heck?"
*
* Basically it is a radar that "sees through" things (like, say, your
* house).
*
* Their capabilities vary widely, but the feds are already using
* them and I
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 2.3.8
N7B95QHi6kcGAppYX6Ai/4tdF4gNa1/Tjp34kF4agWL2Thqx2b3szCdU9EFlOpCD
xNVRA8q/I0KlDNwiZpdaE5GFTh5QPLz9X4LRMcBO/I2PRtMRXRcb4xutmhQLS4fv
b3Rb3oI73H9yeP/rxmBhqiDqlx6f7MuedVRdEyPkJJMqFkejf1WDZ877Dz4Ngi5C
I2QkEGwmCE2wnNmjEdbEEBdDdv9LaNtxqPHUa3==
=qkKc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
