Re: Converting from an ancient BASIC to new database

> I doubt it - it appears to be Qbasic

I meant that the company that wrote the BASIC
program (not Microsoft that wrote the interpreter)
that created the file used their own format, not a
recognized standard.

>>
>> Tom Lake
>>
>>
> Of course I did - it isn't in ASCII - most of the DATA is, so I could 
> probably, with much effort, extract the data by hand

If the unreadable parts come in length of 2, 4, 8 or 16 bytes, they could
be numbers in either MS or IEEE format.

Tom Lake