No, I haven't but I've seen numerous award announcements for it in the past
week
--
Cris Hanna [SBS - MVP]
------------------------------------
MVPs do not work for Microsoft
Please do not submit questions directly to me.
"Brad Pears" <bradp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:uV64inr5IHA.5108@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Thanks, that looks like a nice device. I will get pricing... Have you
used
> it personally?
>
> Brad
> "Cris Hanna [SBS - MVP]" <crisnospamhanna@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
in
> message news:eYWPkMr5IHA.5012@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> http://www.netgear.com/Products/Storage/ReadyNASPro/RNDP6350.aspx
>>
>> --
>> Cris Hanna [SBS - MVP]
>> ------------------------------------
>> MVPs do not work for Microsoft
>> Please do not submit questions directly to me.
>> "Brad Pears" <bradp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:eAGL$8q5IHA.4988@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Can anyone recommend a NAS device that includes RAID technology, good
>>> access speed and is a solid product capable of providing access to
data
>>> residing on the device by up to 10 users simultaneously without
grinding
>>> to a halt? Files accessed will not be large files, mainly spreadsheet,
>>> pics etc... The device will normally not be accessed by this many
users
>>> at the same time - but could be occasionally - so I just want to
source
>>> a unit capable of that. Currently the data resides on a dual processor
>>> Dell Win2K server with 2x75gb, 15Krpm drives in a RAID1 config. I
would
>>> like the access speed of the device to be similar to what I can
achieve
>>> with that server if possible. I am not 100% sure of the exact numbers
I
>>> am currently achieving with my server - I am just hoping that someone
>>> using a NAS or SAN in their environment can possibly recommend
>>> something. I would also be looking for a TB of usable space and am
>>> thinking of RAID1 (2x1tb) drives?
>>>
>>> I have researched a bunch of NAS devices and so far the best bang for
>>> the buck I cna see is the Snap Server 410/210 series. The throughput
>>> speeds are listed at about 252Mbits/sec and response time is .757
>>> millisecond. This isn't really high end but may do for what I need...
>>>
>>> Oh ya, price?? I want to be in the $2000 range max if that is
>>> achievable!
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Thanks, Brad
>>>
>>
>
>
|
