Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Software > Access Replication > Synchronizer qu...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 1546 of 1638
Post > Topic >>

Synchronizer question

by "Don Udel \(ETC\)" <donudel@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dec 6, 2007 at 01:18 PM

We have a server behind the firewall.  We use the Cisco DSL modem to NAT
the 
fixed address to the internal address.  In other words, an external
request 
to address of xxx.xxx.44.82 gets converted to 10.0.0.24.  The synchronizer

was set up with the xxx.xxx.44.82 address. Things have been working fine
for 
several years now.

Syncing on the internal LAN does not work.  The thought was that the 
xxx.xxx.44.82 request would head out (since it was not an internal
address, 
get turned at the router and come back to 10.0.0.24.  However this does
not 
work.  Cisco admits a problem with NAT.  I would like to have the replicas

sync to the hub on the replica farm using the internal LAN (vs dialup).

Can I have two synchronizers running at the same time.  One handling 
requests for xxx.xxx.44.82 and the other handling requests for 10.0.0.24?

Surely this situation has been dealt with before.  Is there a better
answer?

TIA

Don
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Synchronizer question
"Don Udel \(ETC\)&qu  2007-12-06 13:18:12 
Re: Synchronizer question
"David W. Fenton&quo  2007-12-06 23:26:16 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 2:19:36 CST 2008.