I have read about not doing a direct sync over a wan because of the
potential for corruption. As I understand it, the replica that is not
local to the requesting replica is copied across the link and updates
are made in both direction. I also understand that if the link breaks
or disconnects, that corruption can occur.
My question is whether the potential for corruption is on both replicas
or only the one at the far end, which had to send data in blocks across
the link?
Bob
