In article <MPG.22e55a0a8910a639896ef@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
amos@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> I'd be interested to hear from some of you that are using adps, or have
> tried thoroughly and given up on them. I currently use pass-through
> queries and stored procedures with Access 2003 mdbs to sql server 2005.
> That works pretty ok once you get the hang of it all. I've always
> regarded projects as being off the table since MS clearly ****fted away
> from adp years ago.
>
> I suppose there are two crucial aspects to my question.
>
> First, for current development, is adp solid enough to use for complex
> projects; is development notably faster than with odbc and pass-through
> queries; are there performance gains?
>
> Second, what is the sense about adp in the next version of Access, or
> preferably a replacement that's even better for working with robust
> backend rmdbs. I have not read anything about MS' view of Access to SQL
> Server going forward, which is pretty insane.
>
Not exactly a rousing response in the adp newsgroup <g>. So I'm going to
post this reply to the odbc newgroup and forms coding to see if I can
get some input.
